Friday, 26 August 2011

No, no, no, no NO.

(Photo: David Levene for the Guardian)

OK, it's pretty old news that David Cameron has recruited Mary Portas (the so-called 'Queen of Shops') to turn around the fortune of Britain's ailing high-street retail sector: you can find out about it here:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/may/17/queen-shops-revive-uk-high-street.

But it's taken me this long to calm down about it enough to put my thoughts into writing.

Here's the thing. "Reviving the economy" by getting people to spend more money is SOLVING THE WRONG PROBLEM - and creating a passel of new ones to boot.

For too long now, western economies - most economies, in fact - have been run along lines whereby the 'metrics for success' go like this:

- No growth, or worse, economic contraction - bad.
- Rampant growth - bad.
- But a little bit of growth, clipping along at 'sustainable levels' - that's generally regarded as a good thing, for all sorts of reasons.

These are dumb metrics, taking into account only a narrow range of a country's 'good's (by which I mean olnly those positive factors that can be measured in financial terms).  And even then, within that narrow stream of measures, the numbers serve only to mask the undercurrent of rising familial instability and decay: ever-increasing personal debt levels and fragile job security serve to hollow-out families' ability to sustain themselves. Where they can do so, the financial climate means that it's by virtue of having all the adults in the household go out to work (sometimes at several jobs), instead of caregiving; this creates its own unfortunate social impacts,

It may be painful for those people and businesses who make their livings, and rely for their identities, on selling unnecessary "stuff" to the masses -  but we do, desperately, need to change the way we do things so as to bring an end to the inane, insane consumerism that's in the end consumed only our own wellbeing.

There are many reasons why this should be the case - here are just a few:

- a reduction in consumption is useful in combatting climate change. Producing unnecessary stuff, distributing it, and eventually disposing it are all CO2-generative activities. Recession is good for the climate!

- a reduction in consumption, if it comes about because people stop spending their income on things they don't really need, will free those individuals and families from some of the schackles of personal debt. An improvement in their finances should stop them from being chained to unfulfilling jobs, and free them to spend time with their families and friends or engage in other socially and otherwise productive activities.

- a society where we're not constantly being told we're crap if we don't have the right clothes, or car, will help to free us of these deeply flawed values. It would enable us, and most importantly our young people, to discover for themselves this important truth: a life of happiness does NOT come from the pursuit, acquisition and possession of stuff. It comes from being of service, appreciating what you have and connecting with your fellow humans as well as non-human nature. Sappy as it may sound, these things can lead to real joys. Further, the improved social connections they create help people develop the emotional resilience that lets them handle tough times, when they inevitably arrive.

But no - not shopping. Stoppit.

Thursday, 25 August 2011

Think about what you can do to bring about change....

Gosh. If this video doesn't make an activist out of you nothing will....
The Tar Sands protest, and the new proposed pipeline, may be a long way away from us - but the resulting effects on our world will be very close to home - and in any event it's just WRONG. Watch the video, digest the statistics, feel the rage and start thinking about what we can do, here and now, to force change on our lawmakers, businesses and selves for a clean, safe, fair planet....please!


http://vimeo.com/27902739

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/green_tariff_deal_is_just_the_start_for_mea_1_3662160

The island’s branch of Friends of the Earth has welcomed the introduction of a Green Tariff – but believes electricity generated via the Energy from Waste Plant should not be included.

Instead it has called for the MEA to source renewable energy via the interconnector.

Energy spokesman Cat Turner said: ‘We’ve been pushing for a Green Tariff from the MEA for some time and I’m glad they’ve listened to our arguments.

‘It’s also great news that they’ve followed our suggestion of ring-fencing the profit generated to help fund development of Manx renewable energy projects.

‘I am concerned however that only a small amount of the energy being sourced for the tariff is actually renewable.’

She added: ‘In our view the incinerator should not be part of the Green Tariff package. It isn’t green and it isn’t renewable.

‘If Sulby hydro is unable to supply enough electricity then the MEA should be providing genuine renewable electricity to its customers via the interconnector.

‘Also, having now set this precedent, I hope the MEA will allow island residents to buy renewable electricity from the UK too, until the MEA is able to generate green power itself.’


http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/green_tariff_deal_is_just_the_start_for_mea_1_3662160

Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Timely coincidence of events....controversy over the MEA's bogus Green Tarrif just as Mike Childs visits the Island to explain climate change issues for the Island!

http://www.manx.net/news/3000/friends-of-the-earth-uk-speaker-to-give-free-public-talk-at-keyll-darree
http://www.manxradio.com/newsread.aspx?id=53990

What are you doing today?

A tourist visiting Italy came upon the construction site of a huge church.

"What are you doing?" he asked three stonemasons who were working at their trade.

"I'm cutting stone," answered the first tersely.

"I'm cutting stone for twenty lire a day," the second responded.

"I'm helping build a great cathedral," the third stonemason announced.
What are you doing today?

Monday, 8 August 2011

'Trump' and 'wind', got to be some scope for an offcolour pun there.....

Having made a mockery of the electoral process, Donald Trump is now going after wind powe.

This article from the Guardian tells how he's vowed to use "any legal means" [jeez, Donald, why so half hearted...?]  to block a planned windfarm near his golf course in Scotland.

The reason for his ire? Trump claims that it's not simply 'RichWhiteGuy syndrome' opposition to renewable power that's gotten his goat. It's not even the fact that he's worried the turbines will blow his shots off course <snigger> - he's just very, very concerned about the view.

A view which has been completely unspoiled up until now...... except for the...er...20-foot earth wall and spruce trees a certain Mr Trump has put up to protect his property.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/05/donald-trump-legal-fight-windfarm?CMP=twt_fd

S&P’s downgrade is largely due to the moronic toxic-asset ratings of S&P.

The US Treasury Department and Warren Buffett might dispute it, but you can't deny that credit rating agencies have a sense of humour.

Standard & Poors' downgrade of the US as a nation carries a heavy dose of irony, since the extra debt the US has recently piled on recently came courtesy of S&P's - let's be frank here - moronic toxic asset ratings. Great article from the Daily Beast's Nomi Prins on the background is here

Thursday, 4 August 2011

Beautiful moonscapes created out of the rising tide of defunct CDs

...begging the question - are there more iconic edifices to be made out of the detritus of our every day lives - coffee cartons, plastic water bottles, cable ties?

http://www.fastcodesign.com/1664672/an-artificial-landscape-made-of-65000-cds

Has M&S been sold a pup by the Manx Electricity Authority?....

Marks and Spencers is (rightly) proud of its Plan A initiative [Plan A - because there is no Plan B].

So on the face of it it was great news that an important local (IOM) plank in the edifice was announced.
Scratching not very deeply, though, all was not as it seemed....

Excerpt: "Ms Turner said, 'The MEA appear to be re-defining the term 'renewable electricity'. A waste incinerator cannot be considered renewable because the fuel, rubbish, is only burned once. In the UK, 'combined heat and power' (CHP) plants which use incineration are classed as producing renewable energy and are eligible for Renewables Obligations Certificates (ROCS). The IoM's incinerator is however not a CHP plant. It only produces power and actually wastes a huge amount of the heat it generates - as such it would not be eligible for ROCS.' (1)"
http://www.manx.net/news/2983/iom-friends-of-the-earth-questions-authenticity-of-green-tariff

The gaps in our kowledge are where the interesting stuff might yet be hiding....

I thought I'd share this terrific article from Project Syndicate, emphasising very articulately how much of the basics about our world (the laws of physics, usw) we don't actually yet understand - even though we may take it for granted that we do.

http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/rothman1/English